American Rebellion Book 3 of the Revolution
Looking forward to the sequel, The Glorious Cause! Benjiman Frankilin and George Washington to Lord Cornwallis and General Howe are transformed from an idea to living, breathing, able to touch human beings. Although you know the "end game" of the revolution, you find yourself rooting for or against both sides as if The American Revolution weren't history, but a current event.
I had few expectations for this book; it was a used bookstore find.https://lilosaforri.gq/map10.php
The American Revolution: Was it an Act of Biblical Rebellion?
I read it in September, just as I was gearing up to teach American history. So the timing was perfect: this is a book about the early American Revolutionary period, with great details about the battles in Lexington and Concord and the Continental Congress meetings. The history is solid and sound; with enough details for someone well-versed in the subject.
I would think that readers who don't teach US history for a living would a I had few expectations for this book; it was a used bookstore find. I would think that readers who don't teach US history for a living would also enjoy the book. Shaara does a nice job dramatizing the history; creating individual stories for men like John Adams and General Gage without becoming melodramatic or maudlin. The events are real, some of the conversations are of the author's imagining based on a solid reading of the facts.
The result is engaging. The book is a quick read; well worth your time, especially if you've been sucked in to the Joseph Ellis-style works of late. The book well-exceeded my expectations; I really enjoyed it. This book made the roots of the American Revolution clearer to me. It reads like a great novel, but it's history, told in a more lively way here than in our old High School textbooks. I recently reread this excellent historical novel in preparation for my first visit to that cradle of American democracy, Philadelphia. The second reading was even more satisfying than the first.
Shaara's novel opens in at the Boston "Massacre" and concludes with the tremendously moving scene of George Washington having the Declaration of Independence read aloud to his troops in Shaara tells each chapter from the perspective of a different historical figure, Washington, Adams, Frankl I recently reread this excellent historical novel in preparation for my first visit to that cradle of American democracy, Philadelphia. Shaara tells each chapter from the perspective of a different historical figure, Washington, Adams, Franklin, Cornwallis, Howe, Nathanael Greene, etc.
Shaara does a great job building drama around those momentous events known to all: the battles of Lexington and Concord, the Battle of Bunker Hill, etc. It is in these moments that Shaara best captures the personalities, strengths, and failings of these "great" men. I believe I've read five or six of Jeff Shaara's novels, but Rise to Rebellion is surely deserving of my heartiest approbation. Page Colonists cannot be represented inParliament. Never will be. They simply are not an equal part of the empire.
They are not, nor will they ever be, Englishmen. Benjamin Franklin Page You cannot suddenly decide to tax us, exploit us, drain our resources. You cannot do with us as you please. With your wast army and your great navy, you may have the power. But you do not have the right. The Glorious Cause is the sequel of this book. View 2 comments.
The interesting thing about this book is that it allows the reader to experience history in the format of the founding fathers speaking in everyday dialogue. It lets the reader experience what it would have actually been like to be there as it was happening. Ordinary history will give a summary of events and their significance but this book gave a look at the more human side of the historical events.
For instance, it described how nervous John Adams was when he addressed a group at a town hall m The interesting thing about this book is that it allows the reader to experience history in the format of the founding fathers speaking in everyday dialogue. For instance, it described how nervous John Adams was when he addressed a group at a town hall meeting which was his first revolutionary act. Reading the characters' actual dialogue makes them seem more real and familiar.
The details of the dialogue are fictional but the reader can assume that something similar was actually said. This book brings history to life and the content is more memorable than a conventional history book. The time frame is from Spring of to the summer of and the primary settings are Boston, London, and Philadelphia.
I found that I became so immersed in the plight of Boston from that I started mental planning for a Boston trip to visit, explore, and photograph the places so effectively described in "Rise to Rebellion". This book put me in very close touch with the activities of the Continental Congress, the Sons of Liberty, and the lives and activities of John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Gage. I love books about the American Revolution time period. This is definitely one of my favorites. Jeff Shaara has hit upon a great formula which pulls you into the story and teaches something along the way.
He does a great job of using fictionalized dialog to convey history without straying too far from the facts. I definitely recommend this book as a starting place for anyone interested in learning more about the founding of our country. This book was ok. And that's about it. The best thing it has going for it is the plot. It is a good depiction of what happened during the lead up to the American Revolution, and it did pique my interest to learn more about Washington and Franklin, who are the two most interesting, quirky characters in the book.
The second best thing about the book is that the writing is, for the most part, not annoying. However, there was a particular technique that the author used very frequently, which made it This book was ok. However, there was a particular technique that the author used very frequently, which made it a distracting rather than transparent device that the reader shouldn't have noticed. Each chapter is from the perspective of one of the principal characters — Franklin, Adams, Washington, and so on — and the title of each chapter is just the name of the character whose perspective it is from.
So you know right from the beginning who each chapter is about. However, Shaara would begin almost every chapter especially towards the beginning of the book with a few sentences referring to "he", rather than stating the character's name, or starting off talking about someone other than the main character of that chapter, or beginning with a description of the surroundings or of an event.
But the bigger things wrong with the book are that the characterization is not good enough, and there is not enough emotional contrast. But, although the events in the story can indicate who is being written about, the tone, the patterns of thought, the speech, and so on — none of those things gave the reader any impression of character. All the chapters were written with the same tone, same type of dialogue, etc.
The other major flaw is that there is really very little emotional expression in the book. There is much to commend Jeff Shaara for his "Rise to Rebellion.
He portrays their thoughts, emotions, and human characteristics skill There is much to commend Jeff Shaara for his "Rise to Rebellion. He portrays their thoughts, emotions, and human characteristics skillfully both by his selection of content and by his use of language. He has obviously done much research. A scene I especially liked has Franklin touring the countryside in Ireland. Observing the downtrodden population, he recognizes that the King and his ministers, having no concept of the nature of their American subjects, are convinced that Americans can be forced into submission and abject subservience as readily as had been the Irish.
All that was required to accomplish this was the administration of a heavy dose of unrelenting punishment. Despite these compliments, I've rated the book three stars. I found the book to be a slow read. As much as I value subjective narration, I believe Shaara emphasized far too much what his four famous characters may have felt and thought. The book, pages, provided me little excitement.
- Fossil Mammals of Asia: Neogene Biostratigraphy and Chronology (NONE)!
- 6 Poems of Scheffel, Mörike, Goethe & Kerner, No. 6 - Zur Ruh, Zur Ruh ihr müden Gleider.
- The Books of the New Testament.
- Illumination: Joy in the Soul.
- The Revolution Trilogy, by Rick Atkinson.
I judged Shaara's characterization of some of the day's notable participants to be superficial. For example, Shaara portrays Paul Revere as a simpleton who needs Dr. Joseph Warren's instruction of how he is to get across Boston's back bay the night of the British army's embarkation, why he needs to do so, and where he is supposed to ride. In truth, Revere had made the arrangements for his crossing, not Warren; he had ridden to Lexington and Concord a week earlier; and he knew entirely what General Gage was planning.
Shaara's narration of Revere's crossing is full of errors.
- How To Overcome Writers Block In Less Than An Hour!
- Accessibility Navigation;
- Myths of the American Revolution.
- Author | The Revolution Trilogy, by Rick Atkinson?
- The 100 Best American Revolution Books of All Time.
- American Revolution | Causes, Battles, Aftermath, & Facts | vocajiwekafa.tk;
- Discussion Questions.
He has Revere's boat rowed by one person, not two. The boat is beached on sand, not received at the old battery dock at Charlestown. Revere is given a large horse to ride by an unidentified person, not the smallish horse he received from Charlestown's militia leader, Colonel James Conant. According to Shaara, Revere sees the two lanterns in the Christ Church tower after he had crossed the bay and realizes then that the British are using boats to reach Cambridge, not the land route through Boston Neck.
Before leaving Boston, Revere had instructed the sexton of the church to display two lanterns, while he was crossing the bay, realizing that if he failed to get across, Colonel Conant would need to know how the British army was proceeding. Finally, using one paragraph, Shaara has Revere ride off into the countyside, how far we are not told. He writes nothing about how Revere is challenged by British officers detailed to intercept express riders, how he evaded them, how he alerted Sam Adams and John Hancock in Lexington, how he rode toward Concord with William Dawes and met Dr.
Samuel Prescott, and how he was arrested by other detailed British officers while Prescott escaped. Shaara has Major John Pitcairn, whom he identifies as "Thomas Pitcairn," depict the redcoat advance to Lexington, the battle on the town common, the subsequent march to Concord, the exchange of musket fire at the North Bridge, and the entire march back to Charlestown.
Nobody else contributes information. It is as though Shaara did not feel it expedient to provide detail or he didn't know the detail. He fills this void of information with generalizations. He provides nothing specific about the activities of Pitcairn's advance scouts, who intercept several militiamen sent out successively by Lexington Captain John Parker to locate the army's whereabouts.
He does not mention that the six light infantry companies Pitcairn commands, in advance of the six grenadier companies that the expedition's leader, Colonel Francis Smith, controls, divides in half upon reaching the Lexington common, not according to Pitcairn's wishes; and it is the first light infantry company of the six that opens fire on the 50 some militiamen standing on the common.
Shaara has Pitcairn witnessing the fighting at the North Bridge even though Pitcairn never left the center of Concord. The famous incident of Pitcairn falling off his horse and having his holstered pistols, attached to his saddle, carried to the rebels by his horse, takes place no more than a mile east of Concord, one might conclude, in a field, not on the road at Fiske Hill, near Lexington. The extensive use of redcoat flankers to attack militia companies hiding behind trees, barns, and stone walls seemingly did not occur. Shaara does write that Colonel Smith's forces were reinforced at Lexington by another army sent out of Boston by General Gage, but he doesn't mention its commander, Colonel Hugh Percy, who saved the combined forces from annihilation or having to surrender.
He does not mention that the worst fighting of the entire day took place subsequently in Menotomy nor how Percy tricked his militia opponents into believing that he intended to cross the Great Bridge at Cambridge and that he sent his forces in the opposite direction, to Charlestown. In one paragraph -- one paragraph -- Shaara narrates Percy's entire retreat, from Lexingto to Boston, neglecting to inform us that the retreat actually ended at Charlestown. I recognize it was not Shaara's intention to write a book about Lexington and Concord.
However, this complex, momentous event did happen. It should have been an important part of the narration. That he glossed over, fudged, and generalized details in the two chapters he devoted to its telling caused me to wonder just how accurate his narration was in other parts of the book.
Shaara would have done better if he had written two novels to span the seven years: the first concluding with the events of April 19, , and the second starting with the Battle of Breeds Hill and concluding with the signing of the Declaration of Independence. That would have afforded him a better opportunity to narrate important events with greater detail.
Dec 28, Thomas rated it liked it. I found this book interesting but it read more like nonfiction with so much of the emphasis on the political machinations leading up to the American Revolution. This made for an airy read, packed with ideas and events and the big names of the day, but not the flesh and blood experience of what it felt like to be alive at this moment in history. Jan 05, Judywoodsb rated it really liked it Shelves: adult-life-reads.
I was surprised how much I enjoyed the book. I knew the basic series of events leading up to the American Revolution. Shaara put the events into a novel format, which made it more enjoyable. There were a couple times when I looked up information because I was surprised; he did his research! From the Boston Massacre through the s, it explores the lives and minds of some of the most prominent historical figures as tensions between England and the American colonies intensity resulting in rebellion and war.
- About Rebecca Beatrice Brooks.
- Keila is sensually shower front of the camera for you (exquisite book with adult content), photos in fantastic quality (only for over 21 years).
- Land campaigns to 1778.
- LAiguille creuse (French Edition).
- Names of foreigners who took the oath of allegiance to the province and state of Pennsylvania, 1727-1775, with the foreign arrivals, 1786-1808;
- The War for America, Lexington to Princeton, 1775-1777.
- North American Rebellion;
Even th rating: 4. Even though both sides are explored, there is definitely a bias toward the American colonies, a given righteousness of the rebels. Honestly, I didn't expect any different from such a novel. The writing style pulls the reader into the events and even thoughts and feelings of the historical figures.
However, Shaara doesn't seem able to get away completely from idealizing the founding fathers. The writing is a bit stiff, restrained without the coarseness that is usually associated with reality. Sometimes I forgot I was reading a work of fiction instead of a really good historical nonfiction. I think this may be the result in trying to tackle so many idealized American historical figures in an accurate manner i. The Congress chose to take command of the rebel militia, incorporating it into a Continental Army and appointing Colonel George Washington of Virginia as its commander-in-chief.
Later that year, the Congress sent rebel armies under Richard Montgomery and Benedict Arnold to seize Quebec , but they were defeated by Governor Guy Carleton , and driven back the following spring. By the spring of , under the influence of radical agitator Thomas Paine 's inflammatory pamphlet Common Sense , popular opinion among the colonists had swung decisively in favor of independence.
Gage had been recalled to Britain following the outbreak of the Rebellion, and General William Howe had been appointed to replace him as commander of British forces in America. However, Howe chose to retreat to Halifax for several months to regroup and await the arrival of reinforcements before beginning his occupation of New York in September However, he was able to forestall the collapse of the Rebellion for a time by making successful attacks on Trenton and Princeton , forcing the British to retreat back to New York City.
The following spring, the British resumed their offensive, launching coordinated attacks against Philadelphia and Albany , New York. General John Burgoyne led the northern attack, marching south from Quebec, while General Howe led the southern attack, landing at the head of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and marching north.
Washington was compelled to divide his forces, sending Generals Horatio Gates and Arnold north to oppose Burgoyne, while leading the bulk of the rebel army south to fight Howe. Washington was driven steadily back by Howe, while Burgoyne found himself forced to halt 25 miles north of Albany by Gates and Arnold.
Howe was able to occupy Philadelphia on 26 September , forcing the Congress to flee to York , Pennsylvania. The Loyalist leader Joseph Galloway was placed at the head of a civil government in the city. British generals, however, tended toward a lack of imagination and initiative , while those who demonstrated such qualities often were rash. Because troops were few and conscription unknown, the British government, following a traditional policy, purchased about 30, troops from various German princes. The Lensgreve landgrave of Hesse furnished approximately three-fifths of that total.
Few acts by the crown roused so much antagonism in America as that use of foreign mercenaries. American Revolution United States history. Written By: Willard M. Top Questions. Salutary neglect. Battles of Lexington and Concord. Paul Revere. United States: Prelude to revolution. Boston Tea Party.
North American Rebellion | Sobel Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia
Peace of Paris. Canada: The influence of the American Revolution. American Revolution events. Start your free trial today for unlimited access to Britannica.
Load Next Page.